lifestyle check
Images from Handpsan Luxury Cruises, from where we booked a part of our trip
MSP and I will be leaving for two countries in about three weeks. It will be a semi-working holiday, as going there is actually part of (and funded by) a new business project we have in the works.
He is no good at planning, so I had to take care of the itinerary - booking the multiple flights, the hotels, the cruises, etc. I also planned the budget for each activity.
As I was doing the numbers, I quickly realized that traveling is not cheap. If we want to (a) travel at least two times a year for the rest of our lives AND (b) have the freedom to just pack up and live in other countries for a few months, we have to reassess our lifestyle plan.
Not the time for a luxury home
We initially wanted to buy luxury home in the next two years. This doesn't make sense anymore.
The subprime mortgage in the US showed me this: A residence is not an investment. It is not an asset that can give you real future returns in excess of your invested capital. If you don't believe me, read this.
The house where you reside does not earn money for you, so the money you put into mortgage can be classified as a living expense (like money spent on food, clothes, etc). MSP and I initially wanted to throw all our money on a luxury unit, but now, we're beginning to rethink that plan.
Algebra is useful, despite what I said in college
Last night when I was unable to sleep, I called MSP and demanded that we re-discuss THE PLAN.
What do we really want? Our answers were synchronized:
(a) Luxury travel
(b) Regularly eating in a good restaurant, whether it be in Luxembourg or Taiwan
(c) Having the freedom to move when we feel like it
What do we NOT want? Our answers were also the same:
(a) Kids
(b) Properties that will weigh us down / Exorbitant property taxes and insurance
(c) A leaking roof
In order to live the life we want, we therefore only really need:
(a) A big, liquid pool of funds
(b) A small condominium unit we never have to worry about maintaining
The solution
After thinking up the numbers, we agreed: Instead of buying a luxury home, we would be better off holding on to our money and saving whatever else we will make, at least in the next 5 years. It would be the prudent thing to do. We shouldn't spend more than 1/5 of our net worth on a house.
If we decide to get married, maybe we can renovate the condo to give it one bedroom, install a gourmet kitchen, and hire a pro to make it look like a boutique hotel suite ala Philippe Starck.
THE DREAM DESIGN. Photos of JIA Boutique Hotel, which Stark designed. I fell in love with his aesthetic when MSP and I dined in Felix at the Peninsula Hong Kong, which he also designed.
This is what the suite looks like in real life, without the 'brochure' lighting: click this and this.
We would spend a few hundreds of thousands on the renovation - that's millions less than what we would spend on a luxury unit. The current condo is a good space, anyway. We just need to compartmentalize the pad cleverly (like Starck does) so that we don't have to be in each other's faces. It already has a nice semi-high ceiling, good structure, clean look. It is cleverly hidden in the middle of the city. There's a pool, and a store selling pancakes just opened in the compound. The only thing I hate about it is the shower, which is just bah. It will need to be retiled.
But what's really great about the condo? It is already ours. MSP and I bought it as an investment two years ago, at pre-selling rate. We were supposed to rent it out, but now I live in this open space, alone and happy.
High net worth
If we decide to stick to this plan of scaling down and just living in a modest space that we already own, we would reach our goal of having high amounts of investible assets much faster. To every person who ever dreamt of making the world her neighborhood, this is the BEST THING EVER. Having liquidity means being free. We can pack up and live in Switzerland for a year and not be worried about money. We can literally STOP WORKING and hop from New York to Istanbul just because.
Will I be able to do it?
Downscaling our housing plan means less worries, more money in the bank, less carbon footprint, lower monthly living expenses, and many other wonderful things. Of course, it also means smaller closets. That could be a problem. I have designer things that do not belong in boxes, and MSP has (ugly) collectibles that (geeky) guys just love to amass. A clever closet needs to designed.
And then there's 'other people's perceptions.' In this sad world, appearances count. You are often judged by the house you live in or car you drive.
Eh, so what?
Honestly, though, I'm over the whole image thing. I used to be conscious about it before I hit 25. But now, I don't care anymore. I have nothing to prove. At 27, I've already acquired things that it takes some people a whole lifetime to buy. Besides, no one is watching. My friends will still like me even if I lived in a box (I think). And my relatives are too self-absorbed to care.
In the business I am in, I see low-profile, 20- to 30-something self-made millionaires who live in modest houses and don't mind backpacking their way around the world. These are people with millions of dollar in the bank, run their own companies, and can afford to buy small islands - but they don't. They prefer to be light and easy. I aspire to be like them.
So hey, maybe I can do it - You know, scale down. De-stress. Stop running after unnecessary things. These low-profile millionaires pulled it off. "They live in modest homes, drive older cars, brown-bag their lunches. They don't look like millionaires. And yet they're worth seven figures."
Surely, I can be like them.